However, not all intervention is created equal. The most effective programmes are those that align with whole‑class teaching, build on familiar content and strengthen the sentence‑level foundations that underpin confident writing.
Too often, writing intervention has lacked clarity and structure and just meant more writing: pupils struggling with the same task and not achieving a successful outcome. As schools grapple with widening gaps in writing confidence and proficiency, there’s a growing recognition that doing more of the same isn’t working. The Writing Framework offers a timely reminder of what does help pupils keep up with their peers and it’s not more and more extended writing or disconnected catch‑up programmes: it’s something far more foundational.
If we take this seriously, then our approach to intervention needs to be equally rigorous, strategic and rooted in what we know works. This is where Pathways to Progress sits firmly in the research.
One of the most striking messages from The Writing Framework is its clarity about where writing begins. It states plainly that ‘the best way to teach pupils to write is by teaching them to master sentences.’ Everything else – paragraphs, cohesion, structure – rests on this.
This is a point that often gets lost in lesson design. Too many programmes jump straight to extended writing, expecting pupils to produce more when they haven’t yet secured the building blocks that make writing possible. The framework is unequivocal ‘Sentence‑level teaching… is the engine that propels pupils from writing the way they speak to using the structures of written language.’
If pupils can’t yet construct a well‑formed sentence, then asking them to write a whole text is at best counterproductive and at worst seems almost cruel.
Pathways to Progress gets this right. It focuses on the effective pedagogy needed:
Following the tried and tested approach of review, teach, practise, apply, sets pupils up for success. Using this structure each week gives consistency and develops pupils’ confidence with knowing what to write and how to write.
Another compelling statement in the framework is: ‘To help manage the cognitive demands of writing, it is important that pupils write about topics with which they are already familiar.’
This is a powerful argument against intervention programmes that use random, disconnected texts. When pupils are already grappling with transcription, vocabulary, grammar and working memory, introducing a new or unfamiliar text adds another layer of difficulty.
Pathways to Progress avoids this entirely. It is deliberately anchored in the class text that pupils are already familiar with, meaning that vocabulary is reinforced, not duplicated, cognitive load is reduced rather than increased and pupils are more ready to actively participate in their subsequent writing lessons with their peers. The intervention strengthens whole‑class learning rather than competing with it. This is what ‘keep‑up’ intervention looks like in practice. It’s not a separate curriculum but a bridge back into the main one.
Talk, modelling and the gradual release of responsibility

The Writing Framework is clear that ‘talk is essential for building pupils’ understanding of written language.’ Writing is not a silent, isolated activity. It is shaped through oral rehearsal, shared thinking and explicit modelling. The framework also emphasises that ‘teaching approaches that allow a slow release of responsibility from the teacher to the pupil have been shown to be effective.’
That is why Pathways to Progress uses these approaches over and over again. They work. Sessions are structured around clear teacher modelling and guided practice leading to gradual independent application.
This is aligned with what research, such as from the EEF, tells us about how pupils learn to write and how they regain confidence when they’ve fallen behind.
Early identification and targeted support: what the framework expects
The Writing Framework repeatedly stresses the importance of early, precise intervention: ‘Some pupils may find it more difficult… and teachers should consider how to adapt their practice and provide the support that might be needed from the start.’
It also recommends ‘observing pupils as they write.’ This is exactly what Pathways to Progress is designed for. Its small‑group structure allows for close observation – the kind of responsive, moment‑by‑moment assessment that isn’t always possible in a full class with so many different needs and challenges. Teachers can see, in real time, whether a pupil understands a sentence structure or grammatical feature, whether they can apply it and where the breakdown occurs.
High‑quality teaching and professional development
The framework reminds us that ‘high‑quality teaching is central to ensuring that all pupils are given the best possible opportunity to achieve.’ It also notes that when schools use commercial programmes ‘teachers should engage in the associated professional development.’
Pathways to Progress includes this as a core component. Each teaching point is accompanied by a subject knowledge video delivered by Literacy Company consultants, which sets out key information and demonstrates approaches, to help the staff member delivering the intervention know exactly how to support pupils effectively.
It’s clear from reading The Writing Framework that writing intervention needs a rethink. It’s not about producing more writing. It’s about producing better writers – pupils who understand how sentences work and who feel confident enough to participate in whole‑class lessons without feeling left behind.
Pathways to Progress offers a model that is aligned with the research and curriculum reviews, connected to the class text, focused on sentence mastery, manageable for teachers and meaningful for pupils.
If we want all pupils to see themselves as capable writers, then we need to focus on what matters and start giving them the tools to write well.
Adaptive teaching is not differentiation. Over the past few years, ‘differentiation’ has fallen out of favour with the teaching profession as there were many negative connotations surrounding it. Firstly, it [...]
In July 2026, the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) published its Guide to Inclusive Teaching. The guidance highlights that, whilst targeted interventions can have a significant impact, their success depends on [...]